Tor gave out information about the process involved for any Deaf LGBTIQA+ persons who are thinking of fostering and adoption. Also included in the webinar was a deaf person (via a relay interpreter) who will tell the story of their own adoption process, how they found the process along with dealing with communication barriers throughout.
It’s very informative so make sure to have a watch.
This is the shorter summary of the Deaf LGBTIQA+ Consultation 2019/20 into the needs and wants of deaf people who identify themselves on the LGBTIQA+ spectrum.
For the full copy of the consultation report, you can download a PDF via this link here.
Whilst the data received gives a good insight about the needs and wants, there is a lot more to know and understand. More research and sophisticated approaches will be needed and recommendations are given for each question.
If you have any questions please email us firstname.lastname@example.org.
If you would like to make a donation to the work we do, please use the PayPal donation button below.
· 186 people took part which is about 27% of the number who are on the Facebook group Deaf LGBT
· England 143; Scotland 13; Wales, 16; Northern Ireland 13
· 44 attended focus groups in 6 regions of England to discuss 5 of the questions in person.
· Age; the largest response were from those aged 30-50yr; 105 from the total.
a. To reach more people from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.1
b. To reach more young Deaf people.
c. To reach more deaf people who are BAME.
d. To reach more people with Additional Needs.
e. To remember to ask about sexual orientation and gender identity separately in future research.
Q2 Mental Health
· Although only asked about their mental health on the day of their response, it was concerning to note that approximately 38% were in low scores; said they were not doing well with their mental health.
a. Deeper research is carried out to compare mental health prevalence rates in Deaf LGBTIQA+ people.
b. To look at interventions and whether more can be done with expertise from mainstream LGBT+ sector, or wider Deaf LGBT+.
c. Deaf LGBTIQA+ main website to have more links to initiatives around mental health for Deaf people.
d. Deaf LGBTIQA+ to consider approaching organisations like Signhealth with projects that have a mental health incentive for future developments.
Q3 and 4 – Sexual health
· A range of places are attended by deaf LGBTIQA+ people for sexual health; GUM clinics, GPs, STI clinics, local hospital, local service (individual names given). Individual answers were given elsewhere.
· Some did think they could improve their sexual health, but the majority did not. For those who did say yes, reasons tended to be either the need for BSL information resources; access to interpreters; trust issues with interpreters; and needing to change sexual behaviour.
a. We must note that we do not know enough about the experiences of young people and that more engagement is needed here.
b. It would be good to learn and share good practice, the views from our North West focus group suggests that Manchester has it good. It is worth looking into this location further whilst taking caution that small voluntary focus groups do not represent the whole. c. To work with ASLI – the Association of Sign Language Interpreters to look and identify best practice around interpreters in the field of LGBTIQA+ sexual health.
d. To widely champion the need for accessible resources – BSL videos and plain English came up several times.
Q5 – Having seen a Dr/Nurse
· A number have seen someone about sexual health or reproduction issues
· For those who said yes they had, they reported this as either being because of an incident, responsibility, routine.
· For those who said no, reasons were either safe sex used, committed relationship, having no need, abstinence of sex
a. To work with sexual health providers to develop further insight about their services, especially in the devolved countries.
b. To work with reproductive health providers to look further into the experiences of Deaf LGBTIQA+ people about their services, especially in the devolved countries (Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland).
c. To consider whether sexual health and reproductive health ought to be kept separate in future research
d. To champion the positive experiences of services that some respondents have shared e.g. responsible sexual health.
e. To develop and benchmark what accessible services mean
Q6 Counsellor preferences
· 48% reported that they wanted to have lgbtiqa+ deaf counsellors
· 25% reported that they wanted to have deaf counsellors
· 15% reported they wanted to have LGBTIQA+ interpreters with a counsellor
· 7% reported they wanted to have an interpreter with a counsellor
· Lived experience is evidently key
a. To work with key players in the sector to share this information and assess current pathways for Deaf LGBTIQA+ people who may want to develop this career.
b. To try and identify if there are any Deaf LGBTIQA+ counsellors in the UK.
c. To work with key players so that Deaf LGBTIQA+ have every chance of finding Deaf LGBTIQA+ counsellors.
d. Deaf LGBTIQA+ website to signpost people to counselling and where possible how to request Deaf LGBTIQA+ counsellors.
· 64% said they saw themselves as deaf first
· 12% LGBTIQA first
· Quotes from the focus groups make interesting reading
· Intersectionality in the Deaf LGBTIQA+ population is a definite area of interest and something to always be championed in work ahead.
a. To always consider intersectionality in the wide areas of work when supporting, informing and representing deaf people who identify on the LGBTIQA+ spectrum.
b. To consider developing in-depth research to understand intersectionality in deaf people who identify on the LGBTIQA+ spectrum further.
Q8 – Information Resources
(video coming soon)
· Diversity was a theme people picked on
· Reaching deaf people about such resources was a key issue
· BSL access was also a common issue.
· A clear demand was given for co-authorship when developing new resources; nothing about us without us.
a. To create a top tips resource for information providers in the LGBTIQA+ field to use.
b. To encourage examples of good practice in the field of information resources.
c. Dissemination efforts should always take into consideration the needs of our audience – therefore it should be clear, simple and easy to understand.
d. In partnership with key providers and Deaf LGBTIQA+ community members, develop funding proposals to create a range of top information resources needed.
Q9 – Representation
· 95 did not know, 72 said yes and 14 said no
· For those who said yes, a large number of suggestions were given as to how
· We did not get the sense that there is a large majority want for deaf lbtiqa+ to become an established and separate organisation with its own services, rather there was more of the view to work with key partners out there in the Deaf and LGBT+ sectors to look at opportunities for improvements either by making sure that their services are accessible or consider creating new employment opportunities for deaf people to work within their organisations.
· Representation can be useful but needs careful consideration as pointed out by one respondent:
· “Yes, but be cautious about representation as a goal, because that needs fuller uptake and shared ownership to be inclusive. Network is good because it recognises individual power and differences in influence across and within groups. …”
a. To work with members of the LGBT Consortium to develop our work as an organisation further.
b. To consider becoming an Incorporated charity, CIO Foundation but not until late 2020/21, because due to the results of the survey, we will need time to discuss and establish what our aims are first before we change the structure of the organisation.
c. To approach key mainstream LGBT+ providers with the view of forging partnerships.
d. To share our learning with the Deaf sector.
Q10 – The name Deaf LGBTIQA+
· Although this question could have been better structured, a large number of responses raised that the name was long and hard to spell
· A lot was said at the focus groups which make interesting reading
· Suggestions included
o BSL Rainbow *
o Rainbow Ears *
o Rainbow hands *
o Deaf Colourful
o Deaf Fab
o Deaf Now
o Deaf Wow
o Deaf Diversity
o Deaf Freedom
o Deaf LGBT
o Deaf LGBT +
o Deaf LGBTIQA Empower
o Deaf Queers
· Although Deaf Rainbow UK did seem to have more popularity, more work is needed to be done to think about this carefully.
· Whilst we do not propose asking individual deaf LGBTIQA+ groups to change their names across the UK, we have to make it easier for people to be able to find such groups. Our website can go a long way.
· And as one online response summaries it well, “No matter what name, can’t please everyone.”
a. To develop better synergy needed across the sector, especially with the Facebook Group Deaf LGBTQ+ UK.
b. To carry out more work on best options for a suitable alternative name.
c. To resolve issues for navigation for young people or people who have just come out or started to think about their sexuality.
Q11 How to get information
· Many ideas were given on how best to disseminate resources
· Online seemed consistently a highly favoured option, especially given how deaf people live across the UK and often in small numbers in different areas. Workshops were also a strong favourite suggestion.
· Whilst a range of ideas have been presented, they all deserve scoping out, especially in terms of costs; both in terms of resources but also staff/volunteer time to actually implement.
a. For all future possible ideas to consider both online and face to face methods.
b. To seek funding to build much more capacity online.
c. To share with key regional and local deaf organisations, the wants, needs and methods of Deaf LGBTIQA+ in receiving information.
d. To capitalise/bridge on current initiatives that may be happening elsewhere; using their platforms and resources to reach people.
Q12 Information at School
· 152 individual responses were given, 34 left it blank
· We can identify the top priorities being linked to a general desire for there to be far greater openness, reassurance that being LGBTIQA+ is fine, for sexual health education to be a priority. It was very clear from the views of older people that such a concept is needed based on their own experiences at school.
a. To work with key players in the field of deaf education.
b. To work with young deaf people in identifying what resources are needed today and then develop funding projects to take this forward.
c. To look at a number of mainstream resources and consider a list of those that are accessible, and hence promote these via Deaf LGBTIQA+ work.
Q13 Supporting non-British Deaf LGBTIQA+ people
· 118 responses were given to this question, 68 left it blank
· Many of the comments, although individual, related to their own experiences and understanding of discrimination and/or intersectionality
· Comments about equality
· Providing support
· Asking them specifically
· Acknowledging privilege when it is present
· Need for partnerships
· Meeting them halfway
a. To seek funding opportunities to look further at intersectionality, and the experiences of Deaf non-British nationals who move to the UK to live in.
b. To ensure greater access to Deaf LGBTIQA+ work as determined with them.
Q14 Supporting “Sam”, a mainstream 16yrs old
· We purposedly kept this fictional individual’s name non-binary and made it clear Sam was from a mainstream school to remind respondents that a majority of today’s Deaf younger generation do not go to deaf schools with an available deaf community to access after leaving school.
· 145 responses were received, 41 left it blank
o Contact Deaf LGBTIQA+
o Schools should have the remit to support Sam (specific teachers with the responsibility)
o Diversity Role Models (a charity) should send Deaf LGBT+ role models
o Information resources via schools with careful consideration on applicability
o Deaf organisations
o Local specialist LGBTQ organisations
o Wider promotion in Events, Prides, health services,
o Youth Sector related provision, e.g. youth clubs
o Bespoke online services
· Some had total empathy for Deaf individuals in mainstreamed schools and the challenges that can accompany this, other respondents had much less
· Comments from the focus group made interesting reading
Recommendations a. To work with Diversity Role Models and any other similar organisations to share these findings and look at project ideas to specifically reach deaf young people.
b. To consider social media and online ways of reaching young people. c. To work with BATOD (British Association Teachers of the Deaf) and key Deaf organisations e.g. NDCS (National Deaf Children’s Society) to look at ways forward with deaf young people.
d. As with other questions, to look at dissemination issues for young Deaf LGBTIQA+ to find support when they need it.
Q15 Where workshops ought to be
(video coming soon)
· A range of answers were given which gives a real picture of this specific population and its diversity.
· The range of answers demonstrates a whole host of ideas but many of which will need resourcing and practical considerations.
· It is important to be realistic but ambitious too.
a. To always consider the UK and its geographical spread.
b. To prioritise high dense populations as long as travel/support bursaries can be offered
c. To consider partnerships for rural/low density areas.
d. To help organisations decide where to deliver.
Q16 Adoption and surrogacy information
· Interestingly, even though most people responded with yes, no or don’t know, comments that followed suggested that maybe not everyone understood the question clearly as both “yes” and “no” responses were followed with comments about how to improve this
· A very strong indication was given for the need of BSL access
· This follows next by issues around navigation to the right information resources
a. To reach out to key organisations with the responsibility around LGBT+ and adoption/surrogacy for partnership work.
b. To further determine, with Deaf LGBTIQA+ people, what is meant by BSL access to resources, e.g. video stories, in-vision signers.
Q17 Annual Event
· 127 said yes, 21 said no, 32 did not know
· The strong yes response is supported by numerous comments from the focus groups which make interesting reading. Ideas too.
· We also subsequently asked respondents about youth camps and received very mixed responses. 36 didn’t know, 62 said yes and 59 said No. Ideally this question ought to have only gone to young people.
a. To take forward ideas to identified funding sources for project development proposals.
b. To prioritise which parts of these ideas are deliverable given what resources are available or required.
c. To consider different audience needs, but also to be realistic at times.
Q18 Specific spaces at events
· 121 said yes, 22 said no
· Ideas of deaf specific, international specific and lgbtiqa+ specific events were given
· Similar as found in Q15 – “Not too many events as not enough of us” – there is a desire for us to focus on high density events, a recognition that this is not a heavily-populated group.
a. To share these findings with providers of both deaf and non-deaf events.
b. To improve dissemination issues – raised in other questions too – whereby better access and opportunities can be given to deaf people.
c. To consider that some have families, children to accommodate, and advocate that.
Q19 Best way to receive information
· 149 said Facebook, 132 via emails, 86 by newsletter, 58 twitter and 31 by letter
a. To seek funding to invest and develop information dissemination.
b. To approach Facebook and Twitter further strategically with funding or greater volunteer involvement.
Q20 Accessibility of LGBT+ organisations
· From 186 individual responses, including 79 blank answers, categorised responses were
● Access via videophone (12)
● Information given via BSL videos (12)
● Deaf awareness needed, support and acknowledgements (12)
● Access via text chat or email, subtitles. Plain English. Captions on stage during pride events. There is too much reliance on using the phone. (12)
● Employ deaf people, deaf experts (10)
● Have deaf volunteers, include deaf visibly e.g. deaf drag queens (8)
● And others in smaller numbers
Only one positive comment was received –
“Tried the Switchboard’s online chat once. Was fine. Don’t know about others.”
a. To engage with key providers and encourage some kind of audit of services for deaf people.
b. To develop a set of standards that can help providers develop their work.
c. To consider a “Mystery Shoppers” project whereby the findings can be collated to influence needed improvements.
Northern Ireland and Scotland / Next steps
The report includes a comment about each from 2 people living there. Whilst personal and insightful, they offer some depth into the limited numbers who participated in the survey.
· We are mindful that the views of 186 people and 44 via focus groups does not represent fully, the whole population.
· All of the recommendations made will have to be discussed and prioritized, especially given the voluntary status of the committee members.
· Following this, the training needs of the committee members and interested volunteers can be adequately established.
· All of the recommendations above ought to be used in formulating a Theory of Change model, which can then be used to determine the milestones ahead for Deaf LGBTIQA+’s forthcoming work with clear strategic priorities.
If you enjoyed the above, you can access the full summary of the consultation online by downloading a PDF of the report via this link here.
Although we are saddened by the cancellation of our Deaf LGBTIQA+ event to due circumstances out of our control. We do have some good news!
We are able to publish the online result of our survey consultation a day earlier! Please head over to the ‘Representing You’ tab above and select Survey Consultation 19/20 from the drop down options. Alternatively you can click here to take you straight to it!
There’s a lot to read so do take your time and let us know your what you think/opinions are either on here, or on one of our social media pages such as Facebook, twitter or even via our email email@example.com. We look forward to hearing from you.
Lastly we’d like to take this opportunity to thank EVERYONE; speakers, interpreters, palantypists, committee members, participants for your support and understanding.
Many thanks to Consortium for the funding to make all of this possible.
We’re excited to announce a very special event on Saturday March 14th where we’ll be hosting workshops for everyone, sharing important insights drawn from our survey last year and a chance for us to meet you! We have had 187 responses so have plenty to talk about. The day will involve focusing on what our next steps should be for Deaf LGBTIQA as a whole.
There will also be a few invited speakers in attendance.
This is also an opportunity for us to thank everyone who has helped and supported us along the way. We would never have been able to do this without the support from yourselves and the LGBT Consortium.
Please book a place and save the date.
Free tickets can be purchased here (this event has passed)
Today is a very important day, December 1st represents world AIDS day today. An important day to raise awareness and the challenges and stigma against it. Its always very important for everyone including yourself to know your status. It’s free quick and easy, and can even be done in your own home!
Daniel McManus is a 35 year old deaf gay man who is outspoken on his Facebook page on what is close to his heart through personal experiences; LGBTIQA+ equality. He was mainstreamed at Dingwall Academy in Scotland and is now working in finance. He likes health and fitness, cooking, LGBTIQA+ issues (obviously!), international cinema, writing, reading, and outdoor activities. Daniel wanted to express his opinion on the recent protests at two schools in Birmingham that has been going on for 6 months as some parents and others in the community were concerned that the equality programme that explains different types of modern families being introduced went against their religious beliefs and felt that it promoted LGBTIQA sexuality. Due to harressment against parents and staff at these schools, the council imposed a temporary no protest zone around the schools, and this was made pernament on 26th November by the Birmingham High Court as the ruling Judge Mr Justice Warby stated that the injunction “does not amount to unlawful discrimination against the protestors” and added the protesters had “misunderstood and misrepresented that is being taught at the school” and that the lessons were not promoting homosexuality”
The government has made LGBT education compulsory in the RSE curriculum in all schools as planned from September 2020, so parents will not get a veto then.
THE BIRMINGHAM ANTI-LGBT PROTESTERS SHOULD LEARN FROM SECTION 28 Repealing Section 28 in the early 2000s was one of the greatest achievements for LGBT rights. Enacted in 1988 by Margaret Thatcher, the former UK Prime Minister and the leader of the Conservative political party, the anti-gay legislation banned councils from funding any kind of publications, plays, and films, showing LGBT content while teachers weren’t allowed to teach about gay relationships in schools. One of the reasonings for such legislation, Thatcher asserted, was that “children who need to be taught to respect traditional moral values are being taught that they have an inalienable right to be gay. All of those children are being cheated of a sound start in life. Yes, cheated.”
Such was the attitude prevalent at the time simply due to ignorance, fear and bigotry. For 15 years, this had a detrimental impact on the lives of LGBT people across the country. As a teenager who was also deaf, I was struggling to comprehend what I was going through when puberty hit. Bear in mind that there was no mobile phones, no Internet or social media. All the information that the public received was through the television, radio or newspaper – the medium most inaccessible to the majority of deaf LGBT people. And the tone of this media at the time was an insidiously homophobic one against which the LGBT community was utterly powerless to fight.
In high school, my peers noticed I was ‘queer’ but I did not understand the meaning of such slur. ‘Gay’, ‘poof’ and ‘bent’ were the other terms that were so casually thrown around the classroom and clearly targeted at me, yet I had no idea what those words meant. Nobody explained them clearly to me, but I had already surmised that they had negative connotations. Despite having eventually realised that I was attracted to persons of the same sex, for the entirety of my school life I still grappled with my sexuality. I was convinced that there was something wrong with me and at one point I didn’t even want to be a ‘poof’.
The endless bullying and mockery eventually took its toll on my mental health. Yet, I was still completely in the dark about what this strange, bewildering part of me was and why it was happening to me, let alone whether there was anyone else out there who was like me. Growing up in the rural Scottish Highland town with no one to turn to for advice, I had an immense hunger for knowledge. So when I finally got a new computer and I was connected to the Internet for the first time, I was astonished by what I came across in cyberspace. The first word I wrote in the search bar was simply ‘gay’. And when the results came up I was utterly overwhelmed. I was only 15 years old. At 16, I was forced to come out to my father after he discovered a handwritten letter from a gay deaf friend of mine while tidying up my bedroom. I was at school at the time. In the letter there was a lot of discussion about being gay. Suffice to say that my father didn’t take it well. He talked about his fear of gay people, about the dangers of AIDS and ‘queer-bashing’. For these reasons he didn’t want me to be gay. Fortunately however, in the end he eventually came round and accepted me and hugged me. Now I’m 35 years old. Although it has been almost 20 years since Section 28 was repealed, the wounds from that painful period never really completely healed. Indeed, mental health remains a major issue in the LGBT community, even among the youths today because many teachers are still reluctant to talk about LGBT issues, either because they feel it’s inappropriate or a taboo. Because of this, I was still desperately ignorant about STIs and HIV/AIDS well into my early 20s. I once went to the sexual health clinic in a panic after kissing another man because I thought I had caught AIDS from him. I often wonder what my childhood would have been like had the schools been allowed to discuss gay relationships, whether in sex education (to be fair, even straight sex education was atrocious!) or in casual classroom conversation with any teacher. Incidentally, my guidance teacher once told me to just stop being gay because “it isn’t natural” after I had come to him for advice on how to stop the bullying. As a fully grown gay adult, it’s inevitable for these painful memories to flood back from time to time, especially when I read the news about homophobia.
So when the news arrived that a judge made the decision to permanently ban the protests held by a group of angry anti-LGBT parents outside a Birmingham school, I was elated. I was elated because it shows that Britain has come a long, long way from Section 28. The parents, mainly of Muslim faith, were demanding an end to the equality lessons at their children’s school because teaching children that LGBT people merely exist goes against their religious beliefs. They’ve spent the last 6 months tirelessly promoting hate speech by waving anti-LGBT banners, spreading deliberate misinformation and refusing to be educated about what was actually being taught at the school. Forcing the school to censor a section of society because it doesn’t fit in with their religious worldview is neither acceptable nor a right. So these parents would do very well to reconcile their religious beliefs rationally in order to be compatible with the secular values upheld by the pluralistic society in which we all inhabit by discarding their outdated homophobic views. And understanding that the only agenda that we LGBT people have for their children is for them to be taught that respect and acceptance, not hate and bigotry, are the only way, and for any LGBT children present to be told that it is okay to be who they are. Mental health, as previously mentioned, is a major problem right now in the LGBT community, and suicide is still blighting lives so these lessons being taught in school are literally a life-saver and that, without a doubt, is a priority. After all, what would these parents, for whom religion they keep preaching to be about love and acceptance, do with their children if they turn out to be LGBT?
We have a BIG announcement! Its finally here, all the work done by our fantastic volunteers behind the scenes. (photos below)
Our nationwide survey is ready. If you are deaf, living in the UK and identify as being on the LGBTIQA spectrum, then we want to hear from you!
TO GET STARTED, PLEASE FOLLOW THE SURVEY LINK HERE
The purpose of this consultation is so that we can find out from you what you would like us to do, what issues deaf LGBTIQA+ people currently face in the UK and help us to make an action plan for the future!
By taking part or sharing it with others, it really helps us to know what you think!
The very first UK Bi Pride is happening this weekend at the Round Chapel in Hackney, London where there are BSL interpreters at this free event! There are interpreters for their Entertainment Stage where UK Bi and LGBTIQA+performances and at the I Am Proud stage for panels, activism and talks. There are also stalls at the event where you can explore too to get different information and buy things. The event starts at 2pm and ends at 10pm and you can easily get your free tickets online at https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/bi-pride-uk-2019-tickets-65781146179.
I asked Davey Nauth, a deaf bisexual man who is involved in organising this event for more information about this exciting upcoming event.
Can you explain a little about yourself and your role for the Bi-Pride?
My name is Davey Nauth and I was born hearing-impaired and use Signed Support English. I joined Bi Pride UK last year as a trustee member to organise Bi Pride UK.
How did you get involved in the first place and being deaf, is communication smooth in the organising?
Bi Pride UK advertised for committee members so I applied to get involved and accepted their offer as a Digitial and Technology trustee member. I had an BSL interpreter for the interview so it went smoothly.
In your own words, why is Bi Pride important to have in the UK today?
It will be first Bi Pride in the United Kingdom, as last year there was a first one in America. It made us realsie how important it is for us to show publicity without fear from biphobia, bi-erasure and bi-invisiblity as they are all prevalent issues. Our chairperson said “Bi and pan people are just not having their voices heard loud enough. Don’t get me wrong, Prides all across the UK do amazing things for bi people and do cater for bi groups, however people who experience attraction beyond gender, make up a significant proportion of the LGBTQ community and bi people are not getting enough of the limelight.”. We aim to create a safe space for bisexuals, pansexuals and all those who experience attraction beyond gender, projecting one simple clear message – bisexual people exist and, more importantly, bisexual people matter.
Since having being established last year, we have been giving advice to Prides across the UK on how to make them more inclusive for deaf attendances.Can you give us some advice on how to do more on this?
As I can see that your organisation have been working hard in trying to make deaf bisexuals more inclusive and visible in other Prides, you could also advise to make other Prides as accessible as possible – with BSL interpreters on-stage, and roaming BSL interpreters on-site.
How did you come about in ensuring BSL access is part of the first Bi Pride?
My colleague and I advised to have BSL interpreters on-site for deaf attendances to feel more welcome and more inclusive to their needs.
What advice would you give to people who are coming out as Bisexuals?
Please join us at our first Bi Pride UK or talk to me about future Bi events across the world. Do not listen to anyone saying that you cannot be bisexual or you have to choose only one side! No more hiding from yourself, be free and fluid in your way whatever way you wish to be!
Here’s the above video done by one of our members Damian on the importance of having the HPV vaccine.
HPV vaccinations are available for anyone under the age of 45.
If you are gay, bi or you are a man who has sex with men? Under 45? We want to tell you about HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccinations (not to be confused from HIV, as that is different). The (HPV) vaccine is being made available throughout the UK through sexual health clinics to gay, bi or MSM (men who have sex with men) who are 15 and up to 45 years of age. After 45, the vaccine is less effective. You will need 3 doses and different time periods.
The vaccine will help to prevent HPV infection which can cause genital warts and HPV-associated cancers (such as penile, anal and throat). It is especially important for those who are living with HIV Please book an appointment at your local Sexual Health clinic to get these jabs. For more information about HPV vaccinations, please see the link below:
We have some amazing news to share! The lovely people at LGBT consortium have granted the Deaflgbtiqa organisation £5980!
DEAFLGBTIQA is the UK’s only Deaf led LGBTIQA charity which has been successful in securing funding from the LGBT Consortium to carry out ground breaking research into the needs of members of the Deaf LGBTIQA+ community.
This will help us to carry out consultations with people who are deaf and identify as either lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, queer or asexual (LGBTIQA) in England. The funding will be used to train volunteers and implement focus groups around England to find out the views of Deaf LGBTIQA people, capture issues they have from being in a “minority within a minority” group and explore how service providers can improve community engagement.
Chair, Tyron Woolfe, “We are delighted that the hard work of the board, working in close partnership with the LGBT Consortium has led to the allocation of the grant to us. We are looking forward to seeing the results of the research to help us develop and grow and facilitate other projects to improve the lives of UK’s Deaf LGBT population.” Findings will be used to engage in discussions with health providers and service providers to increase emphasis on service user involvement and encourage their role in the planning and delivery of healthcare services.
Current funding regulations stipulates that the funding has to be allocated organisations based in England. However, we strongly urge organisations in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland to join us in taking this project forward.
The Deaf LGBTIQA project is just over a year old and has grown its work with our small group of volunteers. Here’s to great and brighter things for our organisation.